Andrew Huberman· PhD
It is now possible to measure the age of different organs and take measures to improve them accordingly.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
It is now possible to measure the age of different organs and take measures to improve them accordingly.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Biological age is not uniform across the organs of your body.
Rates of Aging in Organs, Age Gap & Disease Risk; Risk Profiles & Therapies
Organ Aging, “Ageotypes”; Biological Age vs Chronological Age (1:49:41)
Organ Aging, “Ageotypes”; Biological Age vs Chronological Age (1:49:41)
Organ Aging, “Ageotypes”; Biological Age vs Chronological Age (1:49:41)
Rates of aging can vary between organs.
The age gap between organs can be related to disease risk.
One can be chronologically aged 45, but have a heart biologically representative of a 32 yr old, or 71.
you built some intuition on what biological age means that you can be chronologically a certain age but you can function much younger or older
Biologically, you're a bit older than your chronological age in your skin health, but in others, like you're my lungs. Yeah, your lungs. Like, so this is the thing. This is why age is complicated. And this is what we're talking about is like when you look at your whole body, all 70 organs plus your physical capacity, you realize like your body ages at different speeds, right? Your brain is different than your lungs, lungs different than your balance.