Bryan Johnson· Author
A step towards possibly helping the following conceive: + cancer survivors + potentially same-sex couples (males) + women with fertility issues due to absent or dysfunctional eggs
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
A step towards possibly helping the following conceive: + cancer survivors + potentially same-sex couples (males) + women with fertility issues due to absent or dysfunctional eggs
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we work do research in this area as well where we're taking essentially the nucleus from a skin cell and putting it into a into another into an egg and just replacing genetic material.