The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Not necessarily. It's more about sexually transmitted infections more than anything else. The rare things that people have kind of commented on, like anal incontinence temporarily or things like that, very rare. Mostly it's just sexually transmitted infections because it's more easy to create bleeding through anal sex if you're not careful.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.