Andrew Huberman· PhD
we have brain circuits that are devoted to what's called a social homeostasis.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we have brain circuits that are devoted to what's called a social homeostasis.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and so this maybe people brushed it off for a long time is just oh it's confusing this literature is inconsistent or maybe there's one model that makes it all make sense that is social homeostasis where you know you're used to getting this at a certain point and so my affector system gets activated I I detect that I'm alone it's I want more the deficits detected then my affector systems gets activated this and then I start spinning all the systems that try to get me back into contact
this idea that okay why is it with acute social isolation humans monkeys mice you know you acutely isolate the individual from the social group you reintroduce them to the social group rebound of pro-social interaction oh so happy to see you there's like all these affiliative interactions a Hu a burst of affiliative interactions