Andrew Huberman· PhD
I am very wary of particular sources that are sold online that are not clean. They contain contaminants and that could be dangerous.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I am very wary of particular sources that are sold online that are not clean. They contain contaminants and that could be dangerous.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Sorry for this insertion here, but there are a lot of peptides available without a prescription on the internet. They are almost all contaminated with something called LPS, lipolysaccharide, which is not something you want to be injecting a lot over time. That's actually how we induce an immune response in animals in the laboratory. And it is amazing to me how many websites are selling this stuff, and it arrives to you easily. You just buy it on the internet. It says not for human or animal use, and people are injecting it. And the LPS issue is something I think is potentially going to shut down that whole market at some point.