The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But here we're 100% focused on each other and focus on the idea. And like sometimes playing with ideas that we both don't know the answer to, like a question we don't know the answer to. We're both like fumbling with it, trying to figure out, trying to get some insights at something we haven't really figured out before and together arriving at that. I think that's magical.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.