Andrew Huberman· PhD
He defines trauma as an event or something that fundamentally changes the way that your nervous system works such that you function less adaptively going forward from that event.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
He defines trauma as an event or something that fundamentally changes the way that your nervous system works such that you function less adaptively going forward from that event.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The operational definition of trauma is that some fear took place which of course includes stress and anxiety and that fear somehow gets embedded or activated in our nervous system such that it shows up at times when it's maladaptive meaning that fear doesn't serve us well and it gets reactivated at various times.