Andrew Huberman· PhD
The more intra-workout carbs ultra long distance athletes take, in general, they do better. I think they've studied this in cyclists quite often.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
The more intra-workout carbs ultra long distance athletes take, in general, they do better. I think they've studied this in cyclists quite often.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now if you're decent doing something less than an hour all of us could do just as 12 with no carbs ever
i have found for me personally that any activity up to about two hours at you know pretty decent exertion i don't need glucose
I just you know I've looked at the intro workout stuff I mean you know if you're working out for two three hours at a time maybe it's useful to get some glucose and carbohydrate in to maintain performance but you know I think bodybuilders or weightlifters tend to overestimate like how difficult their workouts actually are
you know I've looked at the intro workout stuff I mean you know if you're working out for two three hours at a time maybe it's useful to get some glucose and carbohydrate in to maintain performance but you know I think bodybuilders or weightlifters tend to overestimate like how difficult their workouts actually are