The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
fruit has this really bad reputation really I love fruit I love fruit too but people think that it has sugar and that it's bad for you it has fructose but no it's not that type of sugar is not bad for you if we can just agree on the fact that fruit has a lot of nutritional benefit especially when it comes to vitamins and antioxidants that can be extremely beneficial in decreasing inflammation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i am certainly not someone and i will talk about this later in the podcast who believes that quote sugar from fruit is bad for humans i think we should welcome that into our diet in moderate amounts obviously don't eat it to the extreme at the exclusion of more nutrient-rich foods
but there's actually no evidence in the medical literature that fructose as a part of fruit sugar causes us any harm