Paul Saladino· MD
Our ancestors hunted animals preferentially and ate them nose to tail. During times of scarcity, they may have used plants as survival food but these were fallback foods, at best.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Our ancestors hunted animals preferentially and ate them nose to tail. During times of scarcity, they may have used plants as survival food but these were fallback foods, at best.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
my perspective is that as humans our ancestors have always favored animal meat and organs and used that as the primary food and then we've used animal we've used plants as kind of fallback foods when we're using it as food and we go to great lengths to detoxify it
our ancestors needed these foods as like bridging fallback foods so they had to know how to detoxify them
this is an animal-based diet you've got the most nutrient Retreats on the planet meat and organs these are the foods our ancestors always saw preferentially