Andrew Huberman· PhD
We need to rethink many cereals, snacks, and treats for children.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
We need to rethink many cereals, snacks, and treats for children.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
We've talked about 25 gram of sugar per day is what you want to target which is extremely low.
limit your total sugar intake to you said 25 g per day or less. Yeah. or less and that's inclus like so that's inclusive total sugars so a lot of um you know if you're having fruit that has a lot of natural sugars so it's total then you also want to improve air quality toxins so measure get a filter if you need
I mean, we're talking about like a Capri Sun more than 25 g, right? A cupcake more than 25 g, you know, like any of these things that are like standard typical daily foods that children eat get you past that threshold of 25 g of sugar.
Um really we should be trying to limit sugar to 25 g a day for kids. And I don't think that registers for most people how low that is. When you think about what kids typically eat, the majority of things marketed to children have 25 g of sugar in them.