Andrew Huberman· PhD
And the prefrailty was the omega-3 alone.
Verbal pushback — no audited source on record.
88
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And the prefrailty was the omega-3 alone.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So many studies coming out now showing omega-3 can slow this you know biological aging as measured by these epigenetic agent clocks and that's and even in randomized control trials showing this that it's it's doing that and that leads to functional outcomes as well.
DO‑HEALTH trial: Omega‑3, vitamin D and exercise slowed epigenetic clocks by ~3–4 months over 3 years in those over 70.
Specifically, supplementing with omega-3s alone reduced biological age on several next-generation epigenetic clocks during the 3-year study.
and there we did see this association that women who took fish oil supplements were aging more slowly according to grim age
If you're taking omega-3, it's slowing that rate of acceleration.
And what it was found is that people with a higher omega-3 intake slowed their age acceleration.
But adding the omega-3 alone did slow epigenetic aging in this population.