Paul Saladino· MD
so there's there's no deficiency there just what we see clinically and scientifically I think the evidence is fairly strong and beyond vitamin C there's really no argument for any vitamin or mineral deficiency
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
so there's there's no deficiency there just what we see clinically and scientifically I think the evidence is fairly strong and beyond vitamin C there's really no argument for any vitamin or mineral deficiency
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I find the evidence that higher doses of vitamin C are Arney that are beneficial kind of underwhelming when we see multiple trials like this that are interventional trials showing no benefit
no effect on cardiovascular events
I don't believe that Linus Pauling's ideas around 5,000 milligrams or 10,000 milligrams of vitamin C seem to be effective
I think the interventional studies are pretty weak and showing that any you know that large amounts of vitamin C are beneficial for humans that humans need large amounts of vitamin C