Our read is that taking anabolic steroids is a complex decision with potential benefits for muscle gain and injury recuperation, but also significant health risks and considerations for fertility.
Our read is that anabolic steroids can increase muscularity and aid recuperation from orthopedic injuries, with some muscle mass potentially retained after discontinuation. However, experts caution about significant negative side effects, including cardiovascular damage, liver and kidney issues, and potential irreversible impact on fertility and natural testosterone production.
The mechanical verdict from our sources is: Well Supported.
When considering anabolic steroids, Peter Attia advises starting with a solid plan, a knowledgeable coach, very low doses of all compounds, and slowly scaling up while noting effects. He also notes that cycling anabolic steroids allows for recovery of the pituitary and a return to normal function.
Peter Attia would have used less anabolic steroids and not exceeded 500 milligrams in future bodybuilding competitions due to sensitivity, diminishing returns, and psychological side effects. He also emphasizes that starting anabolic steroids or TRT requires careful consideration of life goals, especially for individuals who desire children, as steroid use can impact fertility. Peter Attia believes the claim that 90% of people using anabolic steroids for over two years can resume normal testosterone production is likely incorrect. He warns that steroid abuse can lead to negative health outcomes such as poor skin, aesthetic issues, and detrimental effects on cardiovascular, liver, and kidney health. Peter Attia has also noted that anabolic androgenic steroid use has caused potential cardiovascular damage and a larger left ventricular wall, and likely significant prostate damage. Bryan Johnson suggests that the potential benefits of anabolic steroids, such as muscle gain and fat loss, are often not clearly defined by users, and that using anabolic steroids at age 19 is generally a miscalculation due to the trade-off equation. Paul Saladino states that steroids have significant negative side effects. David Sinclair gives a definite 'no' for steroids as a treatment. Andrew Huberman warns that taking excessive amounts of anabolic steroids and diuretics has led to deaths and that anabolic steroid use may have negative long-term health effects. Peter Attia also highlights that prolonged suppression of testicular function from anabolic steroid use may lead to irreversible loss of sperm production or natural testosterone production.
The verdict would change if new evidence emerged demonstrating a clear, consistent, and safe method for achieving the benefits of anabolic steroids without the significant and potentially irreversible negative health consequences, particularly regarding cardiovascular health, liver function, and fertility. Additionally, if long-term studies showed a high rate of full recovery of natural hormone production and fertility after steroid use, the verdict might shift.
Mechanistic and trial evidence converge on a real, replicable effect.
Mechanistic and trial evidence converge on a real, replicable effect.
Benefits hold across the populations where it's been tested.
Mechanistic and trial evidence converge on a real, replicable effect.
Mechanistic and trial evidence converge on a real, replicable effect.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.
The headline effect shrinks once you account for trial quality.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.