Our read is that lowering your risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is well supported through early intervention and careful management of specific biomarkers.
Our read is that early intervention is crucial, with half of all heart attacks and strokes occurring before age 60, and a 35-year-old can be informed of a 30% chance of infarct or stroke before age 65 to understand risk and the impact of early intervention, according to Peter Attia.
Our read is that genetic instruments strongly infer a causal relationship between Lp(a) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases, with elevated Lp(a) associated with a hazard ratio of approximately 2 to 4 for atherosclerosis, depending on the concentration, as noted by Peter Attia.
Our read is that pharmacologically reducing apoB to infantile levels of 30-40 mg/dL in adults may be beneficial, according to Peter Attia, and physically active, healthy, non-overweight, and non-smoking individuals may not need to worry about protein intake causing atherosclerosis, as stated by Rhonda Patrick.
Our read is that cardiovascular disease risk prediction models should focus on 30-year or lifetime risk rather than the common 10-year risk, according to Peter Attia. Paul Saladino questions the assertion that LDL alone is sufficient to initiate atherosclerosis and notes that the oxidized LDL test may not be a valuable marker. Peter Attia also points out that some individuals believe LDL is causally related to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease only in the context of metabolic illness. Paul Saladino cautions against relying on the 'weight of the evidence' in meta-analyses that include poorly done studies and suggests the pharmaceutical industry may exaggerate benefits. Peter Attia states that measuring the cholesterol content of Lp(a) particles is not informative for estimating risk and that HDL cholesterol is considered a less relevant metric. Rhonda Patrick notes that standard laboratory reference ranges for ApoB are not ideal for clinical management. Andrew Huberman believes not screening 20-year-olds for Lp(a) is a missed opportunity. Paul Saladino also claims that consuming seed oils or excess polyunsaturated fats can lower apoB and LDL-C but increase LP(a) and oxidized LDL, thereby increasing cardiovascular risk.
Our read is that the verdict would change if new evidence emerged challenging the causal link between Lp(a) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, or if studies demonstrated that pharmacologically reducing apoB to very low levels was not beneficial or had significant adverse effects. Additionally, if new risk prediction models or biomarkers were identified that were more accurate and actionable than those currently discussed, it would alter the approach to risk reduction.
Apolipoprotein B (Apo B), LDL particle size, and particle number are better markers for heart disease than traditional markers.
Mechanistic and trial evidence converge on a real, replicable effect.
The effect size is large enough to matter clinically, not just statistically.
The effect size is large enough to matter clinically, not just statistically.
The intervention improves the primary outcome at standard doses in healthy adults.
Most of the support comes from short or small studies.
The headline effect shrinks once you account for trial quality.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.