Our read is that practicing breathwork is well supported for its potential benefits in stress reduction, mood enhancement, and physiological regulation.
Our read is that breathwork can significantly shift physiology, access certain states, and reduce stress. Specific protocols have been noted to improve mood, sleep, and even impact immune pathways.
However, our read is that certain breathwork practices carry risks, such as passing out, and should be performed with caution and supervision.
Andrew Huberman suggests that cyclic sighing involves two inhales followed by a long exhale. For Wim Hof breathing, Andrew Huberman recommends three rounds of 25-30 breaths with breath holds in between. Andrew Huberman also describes box breathing as having equal inhale, exhale, and pause ratios. Peter Attia notes that diaphragmatic breathing involves filling the belly with air, focusing on stomach expansion. Andrew Huberman mentions that the Kox and Pickkers study breathing protocol involves 20-30 deep inhales/exhales through the mouth, followed by a breath hold with lungs empty for 15-60 seconds, repeated multiple times.
Our read is that Wim Hof breathing should never be done near water due to the risk of drowning, as stated by Andrew Huberman. Paul Saladino and Andrew Huberman both caution that practicing breathwork should always be done under supervision and never alone in water or while driving due to the risk of passing out.
Our read is that new information detailing significant adverse effects or a lack of efficacy across a broader range of individuals would change the verdict.
The intervention improves the primary outcome at standard doses in healthy adults.
Breathwork utilizing auxiliary respiratory muscles can be a free alternative to hyperbaric oxygen systems.
Mechanistic and trial evidence converge on a real, replicable effect.
The intervention improves the primary outcome at standard doses in healthy adults.
The effect size is large enough to matter clinically, not just statistically.
Most of the support comes from short or small studies.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.