Our read is that you should eat more protein, as higher intake is well supported for various health benefits.
Our read is that increasing protein intake beyond the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) is beneficial for body weight management, appetite control, bone strength, and muscle mass, especially for older adults, those recovering from injury, bodybuilders, athletes, and growing individuals, according to Peter Attia.
Andrew Huberman and Rhonda Patrick recommend a protein intake goal of approximately 1 gram per kilogram of body weight, with total daily protein intake being more critical for muscle protein synthesis than timing, as noted by Peter Attia, Andrew Huberman, Rhonda Patrick, and Paul Saladino.
However, excessively high protein intake, particularly from meat-based diets, can inhibit autophagy and potentially be detrimental to longevity, according to David Sinclair.
A protein intake goal of approximately 1 gram per kilogram of body weight is recommended by Andrew Huberman and Rhonda Patrick. Andrew Huberman eats meat about once a day, typically for lunch or breakfast, and prefers high-quality, humanely raised meat. Peter Attia prioritizes protein intake over carbohydrate and fat intake in his dietary planning. Breakfast may be the most important protein dose of the day due to the preceding fasting period, according to Peter Attia. For individuals with insulin resistance and high-intensity training, Paul Saladino suggests consuming significantly higher protein, keeping carbohydrates low, and potentially using glutamine supplements.
Peter Attia states that carbohydrate is not necessary with protein for enhanced anabolism. Paul Saladino suggests that improving digestion is more beneficial than increasing protein intake when digestion is poor. Peter Attia notes that muscle protein synthesis is not stimulated by consuming small, frequent protein meals of 15g throughout the day, even if total daily protein intake is adequate. Paul Saladino warns that consuming excessive protein may lead to a rise in fasting glucose and hemoglobin A1c, and a decrease in arginine levels. David Sinclair cautions that excessively high protein intake, particularly from meat-based diets, can inhibit autophagy and potentially be detrimental to longevity. Paul Saladino also states that plant-based diets may be nutrient-poor and provide inadequate protein for muscle protein synthesis, despite potentially improving insulin sensitivity. Peter Attia and Paul Saladino agree that the RDA for protein for a 70kg male is 56 grams per day, which is insufficient to maintain muscle mass, bone density, and overall function. Peter Attia and Rhonda Patrick also note that the current Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for protein is too low because it was based on methods that underestimated amino acid losses.
It is uncertain whether a minimum protein intake of 20-30 grams per sitting is required to stimulate anabolism, according to Peter Attia. Peter Attia, Andrew Huberman, and Rhonda Patrick suggest there may not be a definitive upper limit to protein intake beyond which benefits cease, but gains become marginal. The definitive answer on optimal protein intake, particularly regarding long-term effects, is not yet known, as stated by Peter Attia. The risk of cancer associated with higher protein intake in humans has not been clearly quantified and may be less significant than sarcopenia risk, according to Peter Attia. Paul Saladino notes that the optimal protein intake for athletes may be lower than 1.4-1.2 grams per pound of body weight and varies by individual factors. Peter Attia also mentions that leucine timing may influence muscle protein synthesis and the difference between plant and animal protein utilization. Rhonda Patrick states that the impact of protein ingestion on tissues other than muscle is not well understood. Peter Attia notes a lack of rigorous trials demonstrating adverse effects from exceeding specific protein intake limits.
Benefits hold across the populations where it's been tested.
Mechanistic and trial evidence converge on a real, replicable effect.
The intervention improves the primary outcome at standard doses in healthy adults.
The effect size is large enough to matter clinically, not just statistically.
Mechanistic and trial evidence converge on a real, replicable effect.
The headline effect shrinks once you account for trial quality.
The headline effect shrinks once you account for trial quality.
Most of the support comes from short or small studies.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.