Practicing sleep hygiene is well supported for improving sleep quality and overall health.
Our read is that consistent sleep hygiene practices are well supported by experts for optimizing sleep quality and duration, which in turn impacts mental and physical health.
Key strategies include managing light exposure, establishing consistent routines, and creating an optimal sleep environment.
Conversely, several activities and environmental factors are identified as detrimental to sleep.
To practice sleep hygiene, aim for consistent bedtimes and wake times, and ensure the bedroom is dark, cool, and quiet, dedicating the bed to sleep and sex. Establish a 60-minute wind-down routine before bed, minimizing light, turning off screens, and engaging in calming activities. Have your last meal at least two to four hours before bed, and avoid alcohol for three hours prior. View bright light in the morning and throughout the day, but reduce overhead light in the afternoon, transitioning to yellow and red lights, and keep light exposure very dim or dark between 10 PM and 4 AM. If unable to sleep, get out of bed and engage in a non-stimulating activity elsewhere until sleepiness returns. For managing time zone shifts, specific protocols including melatonin timing, controlled daylight exposure, and exercise timing can be used. The Eight Sleep Pod 5's Autopilot feature can also adjust sleeping environment temperature based on sleep patterns.
Our experts caution against several practices that can disrupt sleep. Andrew Huberman (2x) advises avoiding bright lights, particularly overhead lights, between 10 pm and 4 am. He also (1x) suggests that wearing socks to sleep can hinder the body's ability to cool off by eliminating the glabrous skin portal on the feet. Paul Saladino (1x) warns that exposure to blue light from screens at night is detrimental to circadian rhythm and sleep quality, and (1x) that using a smartphone closer to the face or at all at night is correlated with poorer sleep quality and longer sleep latency. Peter Attia (1x) identifies checking email, work-related tasks, scrolling social media, engaging in interactive neural experiences, reading about global warming, current events, politics, pandemics, or stressful stock trading as activities to avoid when unable to sleep. He also (1x) considers early school start times detrimental to sleep and (1x) emphasizes the activating and arousing nature of electronic devices as a more significant factor in sleep disruption than blue light. Peter Attia and Andrew Huberman (3x) agree that bringing a phone into the bedroom and opening it first thing in the morning leads to shallow sleep and waking up shortly before an alarm. Andrew Huberman (1x) states that morning sunlight exposure for wakefulness should not be obtained through a car windshield, window, or while wearing sunglasses, and (1x) that looking at any light source that is painful to the eyes indicates the light is too bright and should be avoided. Rhonda Patrick (1x) notes that social media and work-related content are not suitable for a pre-sleep wind-down routine, and (1x) that going to bed at a regular time when not ready for sleep can lead to future sleep problems. Peter Attia (1x) also suggests that heavy blankets and down comforters may disrupt the natural cooling process required for deep sleep.
The verdict could change if new evidence emerged suggesting that these practices have no significant impact on sleep quality or if they are found to have unforeseen negative health consequences. Additionally, if a consensus of experts were to contradict the current recommendations regarding light exposure, meal timing, or environmental factors, the verdict would need to be re-evaluated.
Mechanistic and trial evidence converge on a real, replicable effect.
Benefits hold across the populations where it's been tested.
Mechanistic and trial evidence converge on a real, replicable effect.
The effect size is large enough to matter clinically, not just statistically.
The effect size is large enough to matter clinically, not just statistically.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.
The headline effect shrinks once you account for trial quality.
The headline effect shrinks once you account for trial quality.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.