Andrew Huberman· PhD
And it’s clear that none is definitely better than any.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
And it’s clear that none is definitely better than any.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The data show that zero is better than any
But the data are clear zero is better than any.
at least by my read of the literature, indeed alcohol does seem to be quite bad for our health beyond... I think it's pretty clear that not drinking is better for your health than drinking at all.
But I think that it's pretty clear that alcohol is bad for us certainly past a certain two drink a week limit.
And as I just told you, by all means, do not drink more than two drinks per week. And zero is better than two.
we know it's not good for you. You'll live a shorter life um and has a bunch of other issues with it and what happens when people drink together etc. that can often not be good.
Alcohol is bad for you