Andrew Huberman· PhD
So a MET hour, a MET, just for people who don't
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So a MET hour, a MET, just for people who don't
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Beyond 126 min/week, every additional 30 min of exercise a week was correlated with 4% additional risk reduction.
The “first 35 minutes/week” of moderate and vigorous activity were correlated with the steepest risk-reduction of 41%
more activity further reduces the risk.
with 35-70, and 70-140 min/week correlating to larger risk reductions of 60 and 63% respectively.
35 minutes a week of exercise reduced dementia risk by 41%
those with a “weekend warrior” pattern of physical activity—defined as achieving ≥150 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity per week with more than 50% of their activity occurring on 1–2 days—had lower risks of several brain disorders compared to adults not meeting the physical activity recommendations.
A 21–45% reduction in the risk for dementia, stroke, Parkinson’s disease, depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder were observed for adults who concentrated their physical activity levels into just a few days per week.