Andrew Huberman· PhD
And the animals that have been generated, and mutants that have low growth hormone, sometimes these are dwarfs, they live the longest by far.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And the animals that have been generated, and mutants that have low growth hormone, sometimes these are dwarfs, they live the longest by far.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Going back to the original studies of Cynthia Kenyon, which we talked about in episode one, those mutant worms had low levels of growth hormone and insulin like growth hormone signaling. Twice as long. And this has been reproduced also in mice. And even in humans, there are the Loren dwarfs, we were talking about earlier. These are smaller people that have low levels of growth hormone, or actually IGF-1, one of
the small dogs live longer yes and the ponies live longer and when you mutate growth Ramone or or they are born dwarf they live longer and when you give more growth hormone they live shorter
in mice in worms and in flies decreasing igf-1 and growth hormone levels leads to a 50% extension in lifespan that's huge and the converse is true if you overexpress or increase the expression of growth hormone between 100 and a thousandfold that reduces the lifespan of mice by 50%