Our read is that psychedelics are well supported for therapeutic use, particularly within medical models.
Our read is that psychedelics, especially psilocybin, show promise for treating conditions like depression, anxiety, and addiction by facilitating neuroplasticity and offering opportunities for memory updating.
However, our experts emphasize that these substances are most efficacious and safer when administered within medical models, with significant caution advised for individuals with certain mental health predispositions or when used in uncontrolled environments.
The data supporting microdosing is not robust, and macrodose sessions appear more impactful for depressive symptoms.
Psilocybin sessions typically involve at least 8 hours of preparation and administration in a controlled environment with sensory aids, often including music that progresses from low-volume instrumental classical to intense percussive, then softer melodic music with nature sounds. Doses have been dissolved in orange juice and lemon juice to alter conversion to psilocin and reduce sugar/calorie disruption.
Our experts warn that individuals can experience severe harm or death from psychedelics due to freak-outs, accidents, or disorientation. Rhonda Patrick noted that psilocybin use can lead to death when dose is unknown, support is lacking, or environment is uncontrolled. Andrew Huberman and Rhonda Patrick emphasized that individuals with a predisposition to or history of psychosis or bipolar disorder, or who have a relative with these conditions, should be very cautious with psilocybin (12x). Andrew Huberman also advised caution for younger individuals and those without a trained physician. Bryan Johnson noted that the term 'heroic dose' for psilocybin is misleading because potency can vary significantly between strains and batches. Peter Attia stated that psychedelics act as lubricants for difficult work done off the substance, and are not therapeutic on their own (2x). Andrew Huberman warned that using drugs like MDMA or psilocybin to treat addiction may paradoxically increase addiction by causing a 'dopamine feast.' Some individuals using MDMA or psilocybin outside of clinical trials have experienced adverse effects such as chronic visual snow, new-onset tics, and chronic insomnia. Andrew Huberman also noted that intense focus on mundane tasks during a psychedelic experience can be disorienting. Andrew Huberman claimed that the data supporting micro-dosing psilocybin is not robust. Andrew Huberman claimed that studies on microdosing psilocybin have found no effect or slight impairment in time estimation and production tasks (2x). Andrew Huberman claimed that microdosing psilocybin is less impactful for treating depressive symptoms compared to macrodose sessions. Andrew Huberman claimed that microdosing psilocybin can cause off-target effects by affecting multiple brain circuits. Andrew Huberman claimed that psychedelics are contraindicated for individuals with a family history of schizophrenia, borderline personality disorder, chronic depression, OCD, or anorexia nervosa (2x). Andrew Huberman claimed that intense psychedelic experiences can include sensations of dying or extreme cardiovascular events like a racing heart (4x).
Andrew Huberman claimed that continuous microdosing of psychedelics may have negative impacts, and more research is needed. Andrew Huberman claimed that MDMA and psilocybin can increase neuroplasticity, but their efficacy for eating disorders, depression, and trauma requires further data from ongoing clinical trials. Bryan Johnson claimed that the outcome of taking 5g of psilocybin is uncertain and depends on factors like genetic predisposition, environment, and mental state.
The effect size is large enough to matter clinically, not just statistically.
Benefits hold across the populations where it's been tested.
The effect size is large enough to matter clinically, not just statistically.
Mechanistic and trial evidence converge on a real, replicable effect.
Benefits hold across the populations where it's been tested.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.
Animal-model results don't translate to the human protocol being recommended.