Andrew Huberman· PhD
but there are distinct phases such as puberty, early 40s and 60s where aging is accelerated.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
but there are distinct phases such as puberty, early 40s and 60s where aging is accelerated.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what we know from aging is that aging is a nonlinear process. It's not like with every year of life your brain gets a little older. Sometimes it follows what's more like a step function where you get these big jumps in markers of aging.
aging is a nonlinear process it's not like with every year of Life your brain gets a little older it's a has sometimes it follows what's more like a step function you get these big jumps in in a in markers of Aging
perhaps this idea that we just age uh linearly is not correct that maybe that there are some cliffs uh that come about at at kind of particular phases of life.
We also discussed how aging is nonlinear. It does not progress uniformly across the lifespan. And we discussed the fact that there are certain phases such as puberty, your early 40s and your early 60s when aging is accelerated and then slows again.
Aging is non-linear, happening in bursts.
suggesting our rate of aging leaps forward in our 40s, then again in our 60s!