Our read is that taking growth hormone is well supported for specific medical uses, but carries significant risks for general longevity.
Our read is that growth hormone has accepted medical uses, such as treating burn victims and individuals with growth hormone deficiencies, and can improve cosmetic appearance and body composition.
However, experts caution that chronically administered exogenous growth hormone at supraphysiological doses may increase the risk of cancer and heart disease, and can lead to other metabolic health problems.
While some experts note that humans with low levels of growth hormone or IGF-1 may live longer and be resistant to certain diseases, others point out that the pituitary's ability to resume endogenous growth hormone production after exogenous administration is flexible.
Our read is that excess growth hormone can lead to heart failure, according to Paul Saladino. Andrew Huberman cautions that injecting excessively high levels of growth hormone can cause the growth of all tissues, including organs. Peter Attia notes that higher growth hormone levels correlate to shorter lifespans in dogs. Peter Attia and Andrew Huberman warn that chronically administered exogenous growth hormone at supraphysiological doses may propagate growth hormone-sensitive tumors. Peter Attia believes only growth hormone was an active agent in a trial with metformin and DHEA, and that his own poor glucose regulation may have been due to HGH use. Paul Saladino states that excess growth hormone can lead to insulin resistance, metabolic health problems, and increased cancer rates, and that bodybuilders consuming large amounts of animal protein, growth hormone, and male hormones often die younger. Andrew Huberman advises against the use of DHT derivatives and growth hormone for penile elongation in post-pubertal males. Peter Attia, Andrew Huberman, and David Sinclair collectively warn that long-term supplementation with human growth hormone may increase the risk of cancer and heart disease. Andrew Huberman notes that tumors can grow in response to elevated growth hormone levels. Bryan Johnson paused HGH therapy due to side effects. Peter Attia suggests that proponents of growth hormone replacement therapy may have financial incentives, making it difficult to discern its benefits. Andrew Huberman warns that augmenting growth hormone in teens or 20s can disrupt the hypothalamic-pituitary axis and other organs, potentially leading to infertility and depression. Peter Attia states that administering growth hormone to a child to increase height beyond their genetic potential carries unknown risks, potentially including compromised bone health and osteopenia. Paul Saladino presents Andre the Giant's death at age 46 from congestive heart failure, arthritis, chronic pain, and enlarged heart as consequences of excessive growth hormone. Peter Attia notes that addressing the safety concern of growth hormone requires long-term tracking of individuals susceptible to cancer. Peter Attia also suggests that growth hormone may increase the probability of small, existing cancers becoming clinically significant.
Our read is that the verdict would change with long-term tracking of individuals susceptible to cancer to address safety concerns, and further research clarifying the risks of administering growth hormone to children for height increase beyond genetic potential.
Decreasing IGF-1 and growth hormone levels in mice, worms, and flies leads to a 50% extension in lifespan, while overexpressing them reduces lifespan by 50%.
Human growth hormone intervention has shown potential to reinduce thymogenesis and increase naive T-cells, even in older individuals or those with HIV.
A combination of growth hormone, metformin, and DHEA can reverse human age by 2.5 years.
The effect size is large enough to matter clinically, not just statistically.
The intervention improves the primary outcome at standard doses in healthy adults.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.
The headline effect shrinks once you account for trial quality.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.
Confounding and publication bias inflate the apparent benefit.